He’s expected to discuss the proposed spending plan, which
will eventually get rubber stamped by the board, later this week.
The budget represents a $13.8 million increase from the
current budget, which actually adds up to a 3.3 percent bump, and “does not
contemplate major new instructional initiatives due to fiscal restraints,” Jim
noted.
He also said the budget “focuses on sustaining our current educational
initiatives, with additional resources primarily targeted toward two
priorities: teacher compensation and our new Career Magnet Academy.”
He said the school system ranks 35th in the state
in terms of our average teacher pay, and “in order to retain our outstanding
teachers and recruit the next generation of exemplary educators, we must insure
that we offer a more competitive and professional level of compensation for our
teachers.”
That means, he said, the budget includes an additional $3.3
million over expected revenue estimates to provide 3 percent salary increases
for teachers.
“If funds are only appropriated for our budget at the level
of anticipated revenues, the raise for teachers would only be 1.7% of total
salary, consistent with the proposal in the Governor’s budget,” he added, leaving me to wonder if he really only requested a 1.3 percent increase.
Jim also said the budget “is not without some pain points.”
For example, he wants to cut 12 custodial positions through
attrition, which means if no one quits or retires, then he hasn’t cut any
positions. The budget “also proposes the elimination of several hundred
thousand dollars from our already lean central office budgets.”
He doesn’t actually say what he would cut in central office,
other than some mumbo-jumbo about how “some of those resources represent small
subject-specific dollar allocations to schools, but central office positions
will also be carefully examined and may be considered.”
(Translation: Schools lose money, my buddies are protected.
I’m going to go whine to Mike’s boss because I don’t take criticism well.)
He also said that some after-school tutoring will be
reduced, and “the Project GRAD program will experience about a 15% cut to the
resources that support this important partnership. Finally, the assistant principal
positions at Austin-East and Fulton which have been at a 255 day contract since
reconstitution was instituted six years ago, will revert back to a 221 day
contract.”
After the BOE approves the budget, it will go to Knox County
Mayor Tim Burchett’s office, so he can incorporate it into his proposed spending
plan. Then it goes to the County Commission for final approval.
One thing to note is that some school board members during
the so-called “teacher revolt” said they wanted to increase teacher salary by 5
percent. Slim Jim proposed a smaller number, which is probably more reasonable due to fiscal
constraints.
It could get interesting if it does get bumped up to five,
since that means Burchett – who has long said he supports teacher pay raises –
would have to come up with the money or say ‘no.’(We all know how cheap that guy is. Heh.)
We’ll see. We have a lot of time. The budgets don’t need to
be approved until June 30, the end of the current fiscal year.
In the meantime, you can read the entire memo right smack here.
Also, you can find a one-page budget breakdown right smack here.
No comments:
Post a Comment